|
|
h. Selection-Maturation Interaction
Subject-related variables and time-related variables
may interact. Suppose that subjects in two comparison groups differ
with respect to the independent variable and a subject-related
variable such as age. Suppose also that the dependent variable is
measured twice for each group, once at Time A and later at Time
B, and that the independent variable is introduced in the interim. If
the change in scores on the dependent measure from Time A to Time B
differs between the two groups, this discrepancy may be due to the
independent variable or to distinctive naturally
occurring developmental processes for the two age categories that
comprise the two comparison groups.
Background Information
Example
It so happened that there were an equal number of boys
and girls, so for convenience the boys were assigned to the Control
Group and the girls to the Experimental Group. During a class early
in the school year, a Generalization Probe was conducted for all
children. The experimenter fell ill soon afterwards, and so it wasn't
until a class late in the school year that the children in the
comparison groups were separated, with the Control Group children
viewing the 20-minute cartoon and the Experimental Group children
viewing the 20-minute interactive video. Two days after that, a
second Generalization Probe was conducted.
To see the results, click here (1).
We conclude that the 20-minute interactive video improved the
children's self-protection skills in a potential abduction
situation.
Nonexample
The name of each child in the classes was written on a
separate slip of paper. All the slips were put in a bowl and mixed up
thoroughly. Students were assigned to the Experimental Group and to
the Control Group alternately as their names were pulled out of the
bowl one at a time. During a class early in the school year, a
Generalization Probe was conducted for all children. The experimenter
fell ill soon afterwards, and so it wasn't until a class late in the
school year that the children in the comparison groups were separated,
with the Control Group children viewing the 20-minute cartoon and the
Experimental Group children viewing the 20-minute interactive
video. Two days after that, a second Generalization Probe was
conducted. To see the results, click
here (1). We conclude that the 20-minute interactive video improved
the children's self-protection skills in a potential abduction
situation.
Analysis
The first item is an example in which a
selection-maturation interaction is a
threat to internal validity. If the improvement across the two
Generalization Probes was a function of the passage of the school
year only for the Experimental Group, then we would also expect to
see similar improvement for the Control Group. Because we do not
observe this, we might erroneously conclude that the enhanced score
for the Experimental Group was not the result of maturation. However,
the children in the two comparison groups are unlike with respect to
whether or not they viewed the interactive video two days prior to
the second Generalization Probe and with respect to gender. Perhaps
relevant assertion skills are naturally learned sometime during first
grade for girls and later during second grade for boys. The better
second Generalization Probe score by the Experimental Group relative
to the Control Group may be due to exposure to the interactive video
or to the differential development of boys and
girls.
In the second item, by randomly allocating subjects to conditions,
the only way gender (and other subject-related variables) can be
unevenly distributed between the two comparison groups is through
chance. Thus, the children in the two groups appear to be unlike only
with respect to whether or not they viewed the interactive video two
days prior to the second Generalization Probe. Because of this and
the fact that the Generalization Probe scores increased for the
Experimental Group and not for the Control Group, we can be more
confident that the improvement was not the result of gender,
maturation, or an interaction between the two.
Copyright © 1998 Athabasca University
©
Copyright 1997-2010, Athabasca University. All rights reserved.
Page created by webmaster@psych.athabascau.ca
Last Modified: Friday, 09-Sep-2005 21:01:01 MDT
|