|
|
Course Evaluation
The purpose of Psychology 406: Introduction to Theories of
Counselling and Psychotherapy is threefold:
to expose you to a range of theoretical perspectives on the
counselling process and to encourage you to think critically about
these approaches.
to foster an understanding of how the theoretical
perspectives may be applied to particular client
scenarios.
to facilitate reflection on your own perspectives,
values, and beliefs as they relate to human nature, counselling
goals, and change processes.
The evaluation processes are designed to address these core
purposes, which are represented in the following evaluative sequence:
Midterm Exam, Case Study, Personal Reflection Paper, and Final
Exam. The Midterm Exam and Final Exam require you to synthesize your
knowledge of the theoretical perspectives and to reflect critically on
that knowledge. The major assignment, the Case Study analysis, draws
on one or more theoretical models and requires you to apply what you
have learned to a particular client scenario. Throughout your study,
you are asked to keep a journal to reflect on your own values,
beliefs, assumptions, and biases. The Personal Reflection Paper, drawn
in part from your journal entries, requires you to consider what you
have learned about yourself and the implications of that learning for
your theoretical perspective.
Review the details of the course requirements early in the
course. (Specific grading criteria for each component are provided
later in this Manual.) Be sure you follow the Suggested Study
Schedule, outlined earlier in this Manual, to stay on
track.
Assignment Weights
To receive credit for Psychology 406, you must complete
both the midterm exam and final exam and submit all course
assignments. You must achieve a grade of at least 50% on the final
exam and a composite grade of at least 50% to receive credit for this
course.
| Course Activity |
Weighting |
| Midterm Exam (Sections II and III) |
30% |
| Case Study |
25% |
| Personal Reflection Paper |
15% |
| Final Exam (Sections IV and V) |
30% |
| Total |
100% |
Overall Grading Taxonomy
Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives provides the framework
for evaluating your work in this course. Your tutor will evaluate your
performance according to the nature and level of learning required for
each assignment and exam.
Cognitive learning is demonstrated by knowledge recall,
comprehension of course materials, application and synthesis of ideas,
analysis, organization of information, and critical evaluation of
concepts. The cognitive domain will be assessed in the short–answer
and short–essay questions on the Midterm Exam and Final Exam, as well
as in the Case Study assignment. As Figure 1 (next page) shows, each
evaluation component targets a different level of cognitive
learning. Your tutor will evaluate your work based on the criteria for
each level (as indicated in the chart); review these criteria as you
complete the components.
The affective domain of learning is targeted through the journaling
process. (You will keep a journal throughout the course to reflect on
your own values, beliefs, assumptions, and biases.) This domain takes
into account emotions, attitudes, preferences, worldview, and values.
While this domain of learning will probably be reflected in other
components of the course evaluation, it is specifically evaluated only
through the Personal Reflection Paper.
Figure 1. Overall Grading Taxonomy
 |
|
| |
| Adapted from Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of
educational objectives: The classification of educational
goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans,
Green. |
|
A new course web page has been added
under Assignment Resources - Examples of Case Study Papers. An
excellent case study paper is available for viewing, entitled
"The Application of Cognitive Therapy to a Case of
Bereavement."
NOTE: This particular combination
of client scenario and theory cannot be selected for future case
studies.
|